Blog

Ty Stone Ty Stone

0 Course Enrolled • 0 Course Completed

Biography

Exam ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Cram Review | ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor New Braindumps Files

P.S. Free 2025 PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor dumps are available on Google Drive shared by Prep4sureExam: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1xdghf6YyfOA268HP4-0I9VNTxSsj7BY-

The Prep4sureExam ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor exam software is loaded with tons of useful features that help in preparing for the exam efficiently. The ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor questions desktop ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor exam software has an easy-to-use interface. Prep4sureExam provides PECB certification exam questions for desktop computers. Before purchasing, you may try a free demo to see how it gives multiple PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Questions for PECB certification preparation. You may schedule the PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor questions in the ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor exam software at your leisure and keep track of your progress each time you try the PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor questions, which preserves your score. However, it is only compatible with Windows.

PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor exam is a rigorous and comprehensive assessment of a candidate's knowledge and skills in leading an ISMS audit team and conducting an audit according to the requirements of ISO/IEC 27001:2013 standard. It is a valuable certification for professionals who wish to advance their careers in information security management and auditing and demonstrate their expertise in the field.

PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor exam is designed to test the knowledge and skills of individuals who work in the information security field. ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor exam is intended for those who want to become certified lead auditors in the ISO/IEC 27001 standard, which is the international standard for information security management. ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor exam is conducted by the Professional Evaluation and Certification Board (PECB), a leading global provider of training, certification, and auditing services in the field of information security.

To prepare for the PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Certification Exam, candidates are recommended to attend a training course provided by PECB or one of its accredited training partners. They can also use study materials such as books, online courses, and practice exams to enhance their knowledge and skills. After passing the certification exam, candidates will be awarded the PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor certificate, which is valid for three years and can be renewed through continuing education and professional development activities.

>> Exam ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Cram Review <<

ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor New Braindumps Files - ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Latest Guide Files

Prep4sureExam PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam Study Guide can be a lighthouse in your career. Because it contains all ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor exam information. Select Prep4sureExam, it can help you to pass the exam. This is absolutely a wise decision. Prep4sureExam is your helper, you can get double the result, only need to pay half the effort.

PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam Sample Questions (Q306-Q311):

NEW QUESTION # 306
Select the words that best complete the sentence:
To complete the sentence with the word(s) click on the blank section you want to complete so that it is highlighted in red, and then click on the application text from the options below. Alternatively, you may drag and drop the option to the appropriate blank section.

Answer:

Explanation:

Explanation
competence of the audit team and decision made by the certification body According to ISO/IEC 17021-1, which specifies the requirements for bodies providing audit and certification of management systems, an accredited certification means that the certification body has been evaluated by an accreditation body against recognized standards to demonstrate its competence, impartiality and performance capability1. Therefore, an accredited certification assures the competence of the audit team that conducts the audit in accordance with ISO 19011 and ISO/IEC 27001:2022, and the decision made by the certification body that grants or maintains the certification based on the audit evidence and findings2. References: ISO/IEC
17021-1:2015 - Conformity assessment - Requirements for bodies providing audit and certification of management systems - Part 1: Requirements, ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Lead Auditor (Information Security Management Systems) | CQI | IRCA

NEW QUESTION # 307
Scenario 7: Lawsy is a leading law firm with offices in New Jersey and New York City. It has over 50 attorneys offering sophisticated legal services to clients in business and commercial law, intellectual property, banking, and financial services. They believe they have a comfortable position in the market thanks to their commitment to implement information security best practices and remain up to date with technological developments.
Lawsy has implemented, evaluated, and conducted internal audits for an ISMS rigorously for two years now.
Now, they have applied for ISO/IEC 27001 certification to ISMA, a well-known and trusted certification body.
During stage 1 audit, the audit team reviewed all the ISMS documents created during the implementation.
They also reviewed and evaluated the records from management reviews and internal audits.
Lawsy submitted records of evidence that corrective actions on nonconformities were performed when necessary, so the audit team interviewed the internal auditor. The interview validated the adequacy and frequency of the internal audits by providing detailed insight into the internal audit plan and procedures.
The audit team continued with the verification of strategic documents, including the information security policy and risk evaluation criteria. During the information security policy review, the team noticed inconsistencies between the documented information describing governance framework (i.e., the information security policy) and the procedures.
Although the employees were allowed to take the laptops outside the workplace, Lawsy did not have procedures in place regarding the use of laptops in such cases. The policy only provided general information about the use of laptops. The company relied on employees' common knowledge to protect the confidentiality and integrity of information stored in the laptops. This issue was documented in the stage 1 audit report.
Upon completing stage 1 audit, the audit team leader prepared the audit plan, which addressed the audit objectives, scope, criteria, and procedures.
During stage 2 audit, the audit team interviewed the information security manager, who drafted the information security policy. He justified the Issue identified in stage 1 by stating that Lawsy conducts mandatory information security training and awareness sessions every three months.
Following the interview, the audit team examined 15 employee training records (out of 50) and concluded that Lawsy meets requirements of ISO/IEC 27001 related to training and awareness. To support this conclusion, they photocopied the examined employee training records.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
Should the auditor archive the copies of employee training records after the completion of the audit? Refer to scenario 7.

A. Yes, all the documented information generated during the audit should be kept as audit record
B. Yes, copies of files are in the auditor's possession, as mentioned in the audit agreement
C. No, copies of files are not generally kept as audit records

Answer: C

Explanation:
No, copies of files are not generally kept as audit records unless specifically required and agreed upon in the audit plan. Audit records typically include notes and observations made by auditors, not copies of the auditee's files, unless these are essential and explicitly allowed by the auditee.
References: ISO 19011:2018, Guidelines for auditing management systems

NEW QUESTION # 308
You are an ISMS audit team leader who has been assigned by your certification body to carry out a follow-up audit of a client. You are preparing your audit plan for this audit.
Which two of the following statements are true?

A. Corrections should be verified first, followed by corrective actions and finally opportunities for improvement
B. Verification should focus on whether any action undertaken is complete
C. Verification should focus on whether any action undertaken has been undertaken effectively
D. Opportunities for improvement should be verified first, followed by corrections and finally corrective actions
E. Verification should focus on whether any action undertaken taken has been undertaken efficiently
F. Corrective actions should be reviewed first, followed by corrections and finally opportunities for improvement

Answer: B,C

Explanation:
Explanation
According to ISO 27001:2022 clause 9.1.2, the organisation shall conduct internal audits at planned intervals to provide information on whether the information security management system conforms to the organisation's own requirements, the requirements of ISO 27001:2022, and is effectively implemented and maintained12 According to ISO 27001:2022 clause 10.1, the organisation shall react to the nonconformities and take action, as applicable, to control and correct them and deal with the consequences. The organisation shall also evaluate the need for action to eliminate the causes of nonconformities, in order to prevent recurrence or occurrence.
The organisation shall implement any action needed, review the effectiveness of any corrective action taken, and make changes to the information security management system, if necessary12 A follow-up audit is a type of internal audit that is conducted after a previous audit to verify whether the nonconformities and corrective actions have been addressed and resolved, and whether the information security management system has been improved12 Therefore, the following statements are true for preparing a follow-up audit plan:
Verification should focus on whether any action undertaken is complete. This means that the auditor should check whether the organisation has implemented all the planned actions to correct and prevent the nonconformities, and whether the actions have been documented and communicated as required12 Verification should focus on whether any action undertaken has been undertaken effectively. This means that the auditor should check whether the organisation has achieved the intended results and objectives of the actions, and whether the actions have eliminated or reduced the nonconformities and their causes and consequences12 The following statements are false for preparing a follow-up audit plan:
Verification should focus on whether any action undertaken has been undertaken efficiently. This is false because efficiency is not a criterion for verifying the actions taken to address the nonconformities and corrective actions. Efficiency refers to the optimal use of resources to achieve the desired outcomes, but it is not a requirement of ISO 27001:2022. The auditor should focus on the effectiveness and completeness of the actions, not on the efficiency12 Corrections should be verified first, followed by corrective actions and finally opportunities for improvement. This is false because there is no prescribed order for verifying the corrections, corrective actions, and opportunities for improvement. The auditor should verify all the actions taken by the organisation, regardless of their sequence or priority. The auditor may choose to verify the actions based on their relevance, significance, or impact, but this is not a mandatory requirement12 Opportunities for improvement should be verified first, followed by corrections and finally corrective actions. This is false because there is no prescribed order for verifying the opportunities for improvement, corrections, and corrective actions. The auditor should verify all the actions taken by the organisation, regardless of their sequence or priority. The auditor may choose to verify the actions based on their relevance, significance, or impact, but this is not a mandatory requirement12 Corrective actions should be reviewed first, followed by corrections and finally opportunities for improvement. This is false because there is no prescribed order for reviewing the corrective actions, corrections, and opportunities for improvement. The auditor should review all the actions taken by the organisation, regardless of their sequence or priority. The auditor may choose to review the actions based on their relevance, significance, or impact, but this is not a mandatory requirement12 References:
1: ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Lead Auditor (Information Security Management Systems) Course by CQI and IRCA Certified Training 1 2: ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor Training Course by PECB 2

NEW QUESTION # 309
You have just completed a scheduled information security audit of your organisation when the IT Manager approaches you and asks for your assistance in the revision of the company's risk management process.
He is attempting to update the current documentation to make it easier for other managers to understand, however, it is clear from your discussion he is confusing several key terms.
You ask him to match each of the descriptions with the appropriate risk term. What should the correct answers be?

Answer:

Explanation:

Explanation:
The correct answers for matching each of the descriptions with the appropriate risk term are:
* The strategy chosen to respond to a specific information security risk: This is a definition of information
* security risk treatment. According to ISO/IEC 27000:2022, information security risk treatment is "the process of selecting and implementing measures to modify the information security risk" Section 3.33.
* The effect of uncertainty on information security objectives: This is a definition of information security risk. According to ISO/IEC 27000:2022, information security risk is "the effect of uncertainty on information security objectives" Section 3.32.
* The requirements against which information security risks are evaluated: This is a definition of information security risk criteria. According to ISO/IEC 27000:2022, information security risk criteria are "the terms of reference by which the significance of information security risks is assessed" Section
3.31.
* A definition of the overall level of information security risk that is considered to be tolerable: This is a definition of information security risk acceptance criteria. According to ISO/IEC 27000:2022, information security risk acceptance criteria are "the level of information security risk that is acceptable" Section 3.30.

NEW QUESTION # 310
You are an ISMS audit team leader tasked with conducting a follow-up audit at a client's data centre. Following two days on-site you conclude that of the original 12 minor and 1 major nonconformities that prompted the follow-up audit, only 1 minor nonconformity still remains outstanding.
Select four options for the actions you could take.

A. Agree with the auditee/audit client how the remaining nonconformity will be cleared, by when, and how its clearance will be verified
B. Close the follow-up audit as the organisation has demonstrated it is committed to clearing the nonconformities raised
C. Advise the auditee that you will arrange an online audit to deal with the outstanding nonconformity
D. Note the progress made but hold the audit open until all corrective action has been cleared
E. Recommend suspension of the organisation's certification as they have failed to implement the agreed corrections and corrective actions within the agreed timescale
F. Advise the individual managing the audit programme of any decision taken regarding the outstanding nonconformity
G. Recommend that the outstanding minor nonconformity is dealt with at the next surveillance audit
H. Book another follow-up audit on-site to review the one outstanding minor nonconformity once it has been cleared

Answer: A,B,F,G

Explanation:
According to ISO 19011:2018, which provides guidelines for auditing management systems, clause 6.7 requires the audit team leader to conduct a follow-up audit to verify the implementation and effectiveness of the corrective actions taken by the auditee in response to the nonconformities identified during a previous audit1. The follow-up audit should be conducted in accordance with the same principles and processes as the initial audit, and should result in a conclusion on the status of the nonconformities and any remaining issues1. Therefore, when conducting a follow-up audit, an ISMS auditor should consider the following actions:
Recommend that the outstanding minor nonconformity is dealt with at the next surveillance audit: This action is appropriate because it reflects the fact that the auditee has cleared most of the nonconformities, including the major one, and only one minor nonconformity remains outstanding. A minor nonconformity is defined as a failure to achieve one or more requirements of ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or a situation which raises significant doubt about the ability of an ISMS process to achieve its intended output, but does not affect its overall effectiveness or conformity2. Therefore, this finding does not prevent or preclude the continuation of certification, as long as it is addressed by appropriate corrective actions within a reasonable time frame. The auditor should recommend that the outstanding minor nonconformity is dealt with at the next surveillance audit, which is a regular audit conducted by the certification body to confirm the ongoing conformity and effectiveness of an ISMS3.
Agree with the auditee/audit client how the remaining nonconformity will be cleared, by when, and how its clearance will be verified: This action is appropriate because it reflects the fact that the auditee has demonstrated commitment and capability to implement corrective actions for the nonconformities identified during the previous audit. The auditor should agree with the auditee/audit client on a realistic, achievable, and effective corrective action plan for the remaining nonconformity, including a clear deadline and verification method. The auditor should also document this agreement in the follow-up audit report1.
Advise the individual managing the audit programme of any decision taken regarding the outstanding nonconformity: This action is appropriate because it reflects the fact that the auditor has followed a systematic and consistent approach to conducting and reporting the follow-up audit. The auditor should advise the individual managing the audit programme of any decision taken regarding the outstanding nonconformity, such as recommending its closure at the next surveillance audit or agreeing on a corrective action plan with the auditee/audit client. The auditor should also provide sufficient information and evidence to support their decision1.
Close the follow-up audit as the organisation has demonstrated it is committed to clearing the nonconformities raised: This action is appropriate because it reflects the fact that the organisation has achieved satisfactory results in the follow-up audit. The auditor should close the follow-up audit as the organisation has demonstrated it is committed to clearing the nonconformities raised by implementing effective corrective actions for most of them and agreeing on a plan for the remaining one. The auditor should also communicate the follow-up audit conclusion to the auditee/audit client and other relevant parties1.

NEW QUESTION # 311
......

The customers don't need to download or install excessive plugins or software to get the full advantage from web-based PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam (ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor) practice tests. Additionally, all operating systems also support this format. The third format is the desktop ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor practice exam software. It is ideal for users who prefer offline PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam (ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor) exam practice. This format is supported by Windows computers and laptops. You can easily install this software in your system to use it anytime to prepare for the examination.

ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor New Braindumps Files: https://www.prep4sureexam.com/ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-dumps-torrent.html

What's more, part of that Prep4sureExam ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor dumps now are free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1xdghf6YyfOA268HP4-0I9VNTxSsj7BY-

Cookie	Duration	Description
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics	11 months	This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional	11 months	The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary	11 months	This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others	11 months	This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance	11 months	This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy	11 months	The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.

Ty Stone Ty Stone

Biography

COOKIE NOTICE